<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Animal Identification System (NAIS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthspectator.com/2009/07/18/national-animal-identification-system-nais/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthspectator.com/2009/07/18/national-animal-identification-system-nais/</link>
	<description>Health News, Views &#38; Analysis---Helping You Take Charge of Your Health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:02:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Suydam</title>
		<link>http://healthspectator.com/2009/07/18/national-animal-identification-system-nais/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Suydam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthspectator.com/?p=980#comment-830</guid>
		<description>The irony about NAIS is that it&#039;s a great idea---if you apply it to factory farming and factory farmers only. It should have nothing at all to do with small farmers, organic farmers and private individuals (as opposed to corporations). But the way NAIS is set up, the big corporations get a pass. All they have to report is that they have 300,000 head of cattle at a certain location in Wyoming. They&#039;re not required to put individual taqs on their animals they way small farmers and individuals are.

The whole point behind NAIS is---or at least should be---food safety. Yet the food safety issues always come into play when you have big farms, big slaughterhouses and process plants. The Amish farmer raising a small herd of cattle organically simply isn&#039;t posing any great danger to the food supply.

Yet that&#039;s the type of individual the NAIS is going after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony about NAIS is that it&#8217;s a great idea&#8212;if you apply it to factory farming and factory farmers only. It should have nothing at all to do with small farmers, organic farmers and private individuals (as opposed to corporations). But the way NAIS is set up, the big corporations get a pass. All they have to report is that they have 300,000 head of cattle at a certain location in Wyoming. They&#8217;re not required to put individual taqs on their animals they way small farmers and individuals are.</p>
<p>The whole point behind NAIS is&#8212;or at least should be&#8212;food safety. Yet the food safety issues always come into play when you have big farms, big slaughterhouses and process plants. The Amish farmer raising a small herd of cattle organically simply isn&#8217;t posing any great danger to the food supply.</p>
<p>Yet that&#8217;s the type of individual the NAIS is going after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esbee</title>
		<link>http://healthspectator.com/2009/07/18/national-animal-identification-system-nais/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>esbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthspectator.com/?p=980#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Thanks for telling people about NAIS. 
I am amazed that NAIS is not being covered on conservative talk radio....the one time I did call in the host poopooed me and accused me of wanting to get everyone else angry because I was.  It was Mark Davis WBAP Dallas and he even supports smokers&#039; rights, but thought I was crazy.  And yes, I am angry at having my constitutional amendments broken, my freedoms taken away just to benefit big ag!!!! He just did not get it. 

The comments from the citizens of the USA at the USDA/NAIS  listening sessions all across the US have been OVERWHELMINGLY AGAINST NAIS.  When Rhonda Perry of Howard County, Missouri testified at the USDA listening session, representing herself as a small livestock producer and 5600 families of the Missouri Rural Crises Center, the points she made are salient:
1. NAIS is a solution in search of a problem;
2. the problems NAIS is intended to address come from the processing plants, imported meat, and large industrial livestock operations that are wreaking havoc in rural areas, none of which is the fault of the small producer; 
3. it is these very operations that the government is supplementing, in one way or another, with taxpayer money while ignoring the problems inherent with the operations; yet it is the small producer who the USDA is trying to saddle with this costly program;
4. while NAIS cannot track the bad product from the processing plant to the consumer, which is what needs to be done, NAIS wants to track the product from the processing plant back to the producer when what happens at the processing plant it is not the fault of the producers.
Her testimony was right on the mark and makes it very apparent that NAIS is not about animal health, consumer health, international markets, traceability or terrorism, NAIS is about money, power and control, all intended to put the small producer out of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for telling people about NAIS.<br />
I am amazed that NAIS is not being covered on conservative talk radio&#8230;.the one time I did call in the host poopooed me and accused me of wanting to get everyone else angry because I was.  It was Mark Davis WBAP Dallas and he even supports smokers&#8217; rights, but thought I was crazy.  And yes, I am angry at having my constitutional amendments broken, my freedoms taken away just to benefit big ag!!!! He just did not get it. </p>
<p>The comments from the citizens of the USA at the USDA/NAIS  listening sessions all across the US have been OVERWHELMINGLY AGAINST NAIS.  When Rhonda Perry of Howard County, Missouri testified at the USDA listening session, representing herself as a small livestock producer and 5600 families of the Missouri Rural Crises Center, the points she made are salient:<br />
1. NAIS is a solution in search of a problem;<br />
2. the problems NAIS is intended to address come from the processing plants, imported meat, and large industrial livestock operations that are wreaking havoc in rural areas, none of which is the fault of the small producer;<br />
3. it is these very operations that the government is supplementing, in one way or another, with taxpayer money while ignoring the problems inherent with the operations; yet it is the small producer who the USDA is trying to saddle with this costly program;<br />
4. while NAIS cannot track the bad product from the processing plant to the consumer, which is what needs to be done, NAIS wants to track the product from the processing plant back to the producer when what happens at the processing plant it is not the fault of the producers.<br />
Her testimony was right on the mark and makes it very apparent that NAIS is not about animal health, consumer health, international markets, traceability or terrorism, NAIS is about money, power and control, all intended to put the small producer out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
