Health Spectator

Yogis and Buddhists, among others, have long known the benefits of meditation and mindfulness. Now, Western science is not only confirming those benefits, but attempting to find clues to how it works.

Studies currently being published in the journal Psychological Science by UCLA psychologist Matthew Lieberman and his colleagues seem to indicate that naming negative emotions helps us handle them better. Lieberman and his colleagues used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify regions of the brain that were active during their experiments. Meanwhile, they had subjects, whom they showed faces of people expressing strong emotions such as fear and anger, pick either a name for the person or a name for the emotion.

Only when they spoke the name of a negative emotion did the subjects’ brains react with more activity in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex region and less in the amygdala. The amygdala is a portion of the brain that processes strong emotions such as fear, anger, and panic. The right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex region, on the other hand, controls impulses. Thus, the experiments seem to indicate that naming or talking about a negative emotion helps calm the individual and helps him gain control.

Putting the brakes on

This may be an explanation, the researchers hypothesize, for why talking therapies help people to feel better: Simply talking about the emotion helps “put the brakes on.”

Some meditation teachers advise putting a label on a thought or emotion that we want to get rid of while meditating. In such forms of meditation, the goal is to divest the self of ego-based images and emotions, especially destructive emotions such as greed and anger. The naming process seems to form a separation from the emotion; otherwise, the meditator may begin to identify with that emotion, temporarily becoming one with it, as commonly occurs in day-to-day life.

Previous research has shown that depression often results from negative emotions or thoughts spiraling out of control, particularly in the elderly. One particularly bad practice to which many are prone is called rumination, which one researcher described as “problem solving gone awry.” In rumination, one can go from pondering what has gone wrong to cause the current situation and wind up in repetitive negative thought patterns, which result in depression.

Other workers point out that not all rumination leads to depression. In 2003, Treynor, Gonzalez, and Nolen-Hoeksema differentiated between “reflective pondering” and “brooding.” They described reflective pondering as “a purposeful turning inward to engage in cognitive problem solving to alleviate one’s depressive symptoms.” Brooding, on the other hand, they saw as representing “a passive comparison of one’s current situation with some unachieved standard.”

These same authors found that a brooding response style was associated with an increased risk for future depression while a reflective pondering response style was not. In general, it appears that the practice of comparing one’s current situation with some abstract ideal or even with another person’s situation is psychologically dangerous: it can lead to depression.

As it happens, Buddhist teachers have for centuries discouraged their disciples from making mental distinctions or judgments. One of the techniques they have long taught—mindfulness, or staying in touch with the present moment rather than turning thought inward—has in recent years caught the attention of psychological researchers, who find that it serves to cut off rumination, and as a consequence, results in greater mental health, while avoiding depression.