Archive for the ‘weight loss/obesity’ Category

Alli is out—Use at your own risk

Sunday, June 17th, 2007

We felt glued to our seats. My wife and I were sitting in a small cafe in southern New Hampshire—the only diners in the place—and on the TV in the corner was Neil Cavuto on Fox TV conducting an interview (a debate, really) about the new over-the-counter weight-loss pill just approved by the Food and Drug Administration: Alli.

A fitness expert was trying valiantly to argue, in effect, that Alli was the work of the devil, pointing out its negative side effects and advocating a saner approach to weight loss that might involve, say, proper diet and exercise. But she was outgunned—outgunned by Cavuto himself and his MD interviewee, Fox’s own health commentator, Dr. Manny.

While watching this one-sided boxing match in which the underdog was throwing all the right punches and still couldn’t seem to score at round’s end, we had an epiphany: What’s most noticeable about all the publicity Alli is getting is that the medical community seems to be bending over backwards to remain neutral or to find positive things to say about the drug.

It may be they’re nonplussed by all the hubbub and by the fact that a prescription drug (Xenical) that had not been particularly popular has now obtained FDA approval for over-the-counter use at half the prescription dosage. In fact, such a move could indicate that manufacturers are trying to perform an end run around doctors themselves. (”Doctors don’t seem to be pushing it, so let’s try direct marketing to consumers ourselves.”) And the FDA has lent its imprimatur to the whole proceeding.

Or perhaps we’ve just not caught the right members of the medical community yet. (After all, drug companies do advertise on TV, which may explain the free-for-all we witnessed on Fox.)

But we’ll be happy to point out that there are negatives to a weight-loss program that depends upon not absorbing fats, which is what orlistat, Alli’s active ingredient, is all about. It works by preventing the pancreas from releasing an enzyme (lipase) that enables the breakdown and absorption of triglycerides by the gut. In simple terms, the fat you eat doesn’t get digested and absorbed by your body. It just passes through to be eliminated by the bowel.

Since triglycerides in the blood are one of those things—along with cholesterol—that your doctor is probably trying to get you to reduce, that’s a good thing, right? Well, not exactly. Actually, the high levels of serum triglycerides your doctor is worried about are caused by eating carbohydrates.

And fats, as it turns out, are an important part of the diet. Ever hear the phrase “essential fatty acids?” In case you haven’t, there are essential fatty acids (EFAs) and essential amino acids, neither of which can be produced by the body, which is what makes them essential in the first place. As T.S. Wiley and Bent Formby, authors of the book Lights Out point out, there is no such thing as an essential carbohydrate. So cutting carbohydrates to lose weight actually makes more sense.

What’s more, as these authors point out, fat-soluble vitamins such as A, K, D and E enter the body by hitching a ride with fatty acids in the gut. If you don’t absorb those fatty acids, you may have to do without those fat-soluble vitamins. The information supplied about Alli clearly states that users are urged to take a multivitamin as a part of the accompanying diet regimen. (Much has been made of the manufacturer’s forthrightness in presenting this warning.) What may not be so clear is that the multivitamin likely will have little effect in increasing the absorption of the fat-soluble vitamins if the body is busy not absorbing fats.

We’ve no doubt that Glaxo SmithKline has a winner with Alli. Since the entry cost to try it is around $50, the curiosity factor alone should account for blockbuster sales. But we won’t personally be tempted, given the pill’s health downside and potentially nasty side effects, which include incontinence and get worse from there. (Let’s just say there are worse ways you can be “glued” to your seat.)

We’ll try to cut back on the carbs and treat our bodies to some “burst” exercise. Anybody have a set of kettlebells they’d like to donate?


You might also like:
The Big Picture (beyond our site):

Virus shown to cause obesity

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007

Researchers now have proof that a virus may be involved in human obesity, according to a paper just published in the International Journal of Obesity. A virus had been shown to cause obesity in animal subjects, but the link between the virus and humans remained unproven.

Dr Richard L. Atkinson (Obetech Obesity Research Center, Richmond, VA) and other researchers tested both obese and thin volunteers for antibodies to adenovirus-36—the suspected agent—as well as three other viruses not believed to be linked to obesity. They not only searched for antibodies to the virus, but checked serum lipid (cholesterol and triglyceride) levels as well. They also measured the body mass index (BMI) of the individuals and their percentage body fat.

The researchers also included 89 pairs of twins in their study, enabling them to compare differences between twins who tested differently for exposure to Ad-36.

Animal experiments had shown that when infected with Ad-36, stem cells turned into fat cells. It is well known that increasing the number of fat cells in the body enhances the likelihood that the individual will be overweight.

The present study was designed to test for an effect of the virus on humans.

When all the data were analyzed, the scientists found that 30% of the obese versus 11% of the thin subjects had been exposed to the adenovirus. Among twin pairs in which one twin had been exposed to the adenovirus and one had not, the exposed twins showed higher percentage body fat and BMI.

Perhaps the most surprising effect of the adenovirus confirmed in this study is that while it increases fat accumulation, it lowers serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels.

As expected, the study showed no correlation between human obesity, cholesterol or triglyceride levels and exposure to the adenoviruses known as Ad-2, Ad-31, and Ad-37. Heretofore, this class of viruses has been associated primarily with minor infections such as colds, respiratory infections, and pink eye.


You might also like:
The Big Picture (beyond our site):

Study shows children need more than 9 hours of sleep

Monday, November 5th, 2007

A new study from the University of Michigan published in the November issue of Pediatrics found that children aged 9 to 12 who sleep less than nine hours a night are more likely to be overweight. Their risk of gaining weight was accompanied by other negative risk factors such as moodiness and a lack of alertness in school, according to primary study author Dr. Julie Lumeng.

The National Sleep Foundation recommends that elementary school children receive 10 to 12 hours of sleep a night. Getting less sleep not only affects the children’s tendency to feel energetic and play outdoors, it also affects their hormone levels, which can lead to increased fat storage and an impaired tolerance for glucose. These same risk factors have been shown by other research to lead to increased weight and a tendency toward diabetes and heart disease in later life.


You might also like:
The Big Picture (beyond our site):

Fitness more important than slimness for aged?

Friday, December 28th, 2007

According to a study published in the December 5 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, cardiovascular fitness may be a better predictor of longevity than adiposity, at least for those over 60.

Researchers tracked 2603 adults aged 60 years or older over a mean period of 12 years. The mean age for the group was 64.4 years; 19.8% were women. All were enrolled in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study and completed a baseline health examination during the period between 1979 and 2001.

Participants were assessed for fitness using a maximal exercise test, and adiposity was assessed using body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and percent body fat. Low fitness was defined as the lowest fifth of the sex-specific distribution of maximal treadmill exercise test duration. The distributions of BMI, waist circumference, and percent body fat were grouped for analysis according to clinical guidelines.

Some previous studies have indicated that the waistline is an excellent indicator of mortality, with waist measurements above 40″ (for men) commonly considered a danger signal. However, not all researchers agree with replacing BMI with waist circumference as a mortality indicator.

In this study, initial analysis of the 450 deaths that occurred during the follow-up period showed an apparent correlation between mortality and waist circumference that disappeared when the researchers adjusted for fitness.

“The association between waist circumference and mortality persisted after further adjustment for smoking, baseline health status, and BMI,” wrote the study authors, “but not after additional adjustment for fitness…. Fitness predicted mortality risk after further adjustment for smoking, baseline health, and either BMI, waist circumference, or percent body fat….”

Their conclusion: “Clinicians should consider the importance of preserving functional capacity by recommending regular physical activity for older individuals, normal-weight and overweight alike.”


You might also like:
The Big Picture (beyond our site):